Lattice vs 15Five: Full Performance Suite or Lightweight Check-Ins?
Lattice bundles engagement, performance, and compensation into one connected system. 15Five focuses on frequent, lightweight check-ins. Here's how to choose.
Lattice
Companies maturing their people strategy

15Five
Teams wanting frequent, lightweight check-ins
| Feature | Lattice | 15Five |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous performance reviews with AI-assisted summaries | ||
| Engagement surveys with AI comment analysis | ||
| OKR and goal tracking connected to reviews | ||
| Compensation module linked to performance data | ||
| Weekly/biweekly employee check-ins | ||
| 360° and manager performance reviews | ||
| Recorded 1:1 meeting notes | ||
| Goal and OKR tracking |
Overview
Lattice and 15Five are both priced almost identically, at around $4 per seat per month, and serve similar mid-market company sizes — but they take different bets on what performance management should look like day to day. Lattice unifies engagement, performance reviews, and compensation into one connected loop. 15Five keeps things lighter, built around frequent, research-backed check-ins.
| Tool | Starting Price | Company Size | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice | $4/seat/mo | 11-50, 51-200, 201-1000 | Companies maturing their people strategy |
| 15Five | $4/user/mo | 11-50, 51-200, 201-1000 | Teams wanting frequent, lightweight check-ins |
Pricing Compared
Both tools publish nearly identical per-seat pricing at roughly $4/month, and both target the same 11-50 through 201-1000 employee range. Price isn't the deciding factor here — the real choice is which one's underlying model fits how your organization actually wants to run performance management.
What Each One Actually Solves
Lattice's differentiator is breadth: it combines engagement, performance, and compensation in a single connected loop, with AI-generated summaries of survey comments that save significant manual analysis time. It's widely regarded as the category benchmark, with a large integration ecosystem — but full value depends on adopting multiple modules together, which costs more than a single-purpose tool.
15Five's differentiator is lightness: a strong library of research-backed best practices built directly into the product, flexible enough to support most standard performance-management use cases, with the ability to record 1:1 conversations so details don't get lost between check-ins. Its reporting customization has more room to improve than the category leaders.
Who Each Is Actually For
Lattice fits companies actively maturing their people strategy and willing to invest in a fuller platform spanning engagement, performance, and compensation together. 15Five fits teams that want frequent, lightweight check-ins without committing to a larger connected system. Both serve the same company-size range (11-50 to 201-1000 employees per their published targeting), so the choice comes down to how much platform breadth you actually want to manage.
Our Verdict
Neither is a strict upgrade over the other at this price point — they represent different philosophies on the same budget. If you want performance, engagement, and compensation unified in one connected system and are ready to adopt multiple modules, Lattice's breadth is the better fit. If you want a simpler, lighter tool built around frequent check-ins without a larger platform commitment, 15Five is built for exactly that. As with every review on this site, this verdict is based on publicly available research, not first-hand, hands-on testing of either platform.
Frequently Asked Questions
They're priced almost identically — Lattice at $4/seat/month and 15Five at $4/user/month. Price isn't the differentiator between them; the real choice is between Lattice's fuller, connected platform and 15Five's lighter, check-in-focused approach.
15Five's lighter, check-in-focused model is generally easier to adopt without a big process overhaul. Lattice is better suited to a company that's ready to invest in a fuller, connected performance, engagement, and compensation system from the outset.
Yes — both publish the same target range of 11-50 to 201-1000 employees. Neither is meaningfully better suited to a specific company size than the other; the decision comes down to platform breadth versus simplicity.
Related Articles
Ready to decide?
Some links on this page are affiliate links — see our Affiliate Disclosure. This never affects the verdict above; see our Methodology.