Skip to content
AI HRAtlas
ChartHop logo

ChartHop Review

Real-time org chart and people-analytics platform with transparent per-employee pricing

4.4(G2)
Recommended

Starting at

$5/employee/mo

Best for

Scaling startups and mid-sized companies needing clear headcount planning and org visibility

4.4(G2)
Recommended

Quick verdict: ChartHop is best for scaling startups and mid-sized companies needing clear headcount planning and org visibilitywe'd recommend it without reservation for the profile below.

$5/employee/mo

Reviewed by AI HR Atlas Editorial TeamLast verified July 23, 2026Desk researchHow we review

The rating shown is a third-party rating from G2 (250 reviews), not an AI HR Atlas score — we have not independently tested this product. Our verdict below is based on publicly available research, not first-hand evaluation.

ChartHop is a real-time org chart and people-analytics platform built around visualizing team structures, reporting lines, and headcount plans before you commit to them via sandbox planning environments. It publishes real starting pricing — $5/employee/month, with a $9,000 annual minimum contract — and holds a 4.4/5 G2 rating from roughly 250 reviews. It's positioned for scaling startups and mid-sized companies specifically. AI HR Atlas has not independently tested this product.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Real, published starting price — $5/employee/month — genuinely transparent for a people-analytics platform
  • 4.4/5 G2 rating from roughly 250 reviews
  • Sandbox headcount-planning environments let teams model org changes before committing to them

Cons

  • $9,000 annual minimum contract means very small teams may pay a higher effective per-employee rate than the headline $5/month suggests
  • Best suited to scaling startups and mid-sized companies specifically — less built for very large, complex enterprise org structures

Key Features

  • Real-time, interactive org chart visualization
  • Sandbox headcount planning and scenario modeling
  • Compensation management and DEI analytics
  • Pulse surveys and performance review functionality

Pricing

Core

$5/employee/mo

Scaling teams needing org visibility and headcount planning

  • Org chart
  • Headcount planning

Screenshots

ChartHop product screenshot 1 — placeholder

ChartHop product screenshot 2 — placeholder

Real screenshots pending direct testing access — replaced before publishing per our Methodology.

Integrations

Integration list reflects what we found in vendor documentation at time of research — always confirm current integration depth directly with ChartHop before purchasing.

Customer Support

We haven't independently verified ChartHop's specific support channels, hours, or SLA tiers yet. Confirm current support details directly on ChartHop's website before purchasing.

Security & Compliance

We haven't independently verified specific security certifications (SOC 2, GDPR, etc.) for ChartHop yet. If handling sensitive HR or payroll data is a requirement, confirm current certifications directly with the vendor before signing a contract.

Ready to try ChartHop?

Visit the official site to see current pricing.

Some links on this page are affiliate links — see our Affiliate Disclosure. This never affects the verdict above; see our Methodology.

Alternatives to ChartHop

Related Reviews

Frequently Asked Questions

Core starts at a published $5/employee/month, with a $9,000 annual minimum contract — worth factoring in for very small teams where that minimum changes the effective per-employee cost.

A ChartHop feature that lets teams model org and headcount changes in a sandbox environment before committing them to the live org chart, useful for scenario planning during growth or reorganization.

Our Verdict

Recommended

ChartHop looks like a fit for scaling startups and mid-sized companies needing clear headcount planning and org visibility. Based on our research, it's a strong option for that profile — see the Pros & Cons above for the specific trade-offs.

This verdict is based on publicly available research — vendor documentation, pricing pages, and third-party reviews — not first-hand, hands-on testing.