Remote Review
Owned-entity global employment, EOR, and contractor payments in 100+ countries
Starting at
$29/contractor/mo
Best for
Companies wanting an owned-entity EOR model without third-party intermediaries
Quick verdict: Remote is best for companies wanting an owned-entity eor model without third-party intermediaries — we'd recommend it without reservation for the profile below.
$29/contractor/mo
The rating shown is a third-party rating from G2 (2,000 reviews), not an AI HR Atlas score — we have not independently tested this product. Our verdict below is based on publicly available research, not first-hand evaluation.
Remote is a global employment platform distinguished by owning its own legal entities in-market rather than routing through third-party partners, which it credits for cleaner compliance handling. It publishes transparent flat per-employee/contractor pricing across contractor management, global payroll, and EOR, and holds a 4.6/5 G2 rating across roughly 2,000 reviews as a G2 Spring 2026 Leader. AI HR Atlas has not independently tested this product.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 4.6/5 G2 rating across ~2,000 reviews, a G2 Spring 2026 Leader in global employment/EOR
- Owns its own legal entities in-market rather than relying on third-party partners
- Transparent flat per-employee pricing with no setup fee or minimum commitment
Cons
- EOR tier ($599/employee/month, annual billing) is a real cost floor for headcount-heavy global teams
- Global payroll and EOR are separate priced products, not bundled by default
Key Features
- Employer-of-record in 100+ countries
- Global payroll processing
- Contractor onboarding and payments
- Built-in compliance and local benefits administration
Pricing
Contractor Management
$29/contractor/mo
Paying international contractors
- Contractor payments
- Compliance docs
Global Payroll
$50/employee/mo
Payroll for owned entities
- Multi-country payroll
EOR
$599/employee/mo
Employing abroad without a local entity
- Local employment compliance
- Benefits administration
Screenshots
Remote product screenshot 1 — placeholder
Remote product screenshot 2 — placeholder
Real screenshots pending direct testing access — replaced before publishing per our Methodology.
Customer Support
We haven't independently verified Remote's specific support channels, hours, or SLA tiers yet. Confirm current support details directly on Remote's website before purchasing.
Security & Compliance
- Remote is a global employment platform distinguished by owning its own legal entities in-market rather than routing through third-party partners, which it credits for cleaner compliance handling. It publishes transparent flat per-employee/contractor pricing across contractor management, global payroll, and EOR, and holds a 4.6/5 G2 rating across roughly 2,000 reviews as a G2 Spring 2026 Leader. AI HR Atlas has not independently tested this product.
- Built-in compliance and local benefits administration
These are claims found in Remote's own materials during our research, not an independent security audit — confirm current certifications directly with the vendor before handling sensitive HR data.
Ready to try Remote?
Visit the official site to see current pricing.
Some links on this page are affiliate links — see our Affiliate Disclosure. This never affects the verdict above; see our Methodology.
Alternatives to Remote
Comparisons Worth Reading
Related Coverage
Frequently Asked Questions
Contractor management starts at $29/contractor/month, global payroll at $50/employee/month, and EOR at $599/employee/month on annual billing -- all published, with no setup fee or minimum commitment.
Remote owns its own legal entities in every market it operates in, rather than relying on third-party intermediaries in the compliance chain -- a structural difference reviewers specifically credit for cleaner compliance handling.
Our Verdict
RecommendedRemote looks like a fit for companies wanting an owned-entity eor model without third-party intermediaries. Based on our research, it's a strong option for that profile — see the Pros & Cons above for the specific trade-offs.
This verdict is based on publicly available research — vendor documentation, pricing pages, and third-party reviews — not first-hand, hands-on testing.